Reply concerning validity of bigenderists
Under similar circumstances would you be able to brush off the outcome as easily if some of the supported phrases would be "Bigenderists are simply CD's in denial" and/or "Bigenderism equals MPD/Shizotypical personality disorders" ?
I would follow such phrase with this process.
First, I think such statement would be academic not practical. There is sufficient numbers of bigenderists, CDs, and MPD that I know are out there. I dont know of any derogatory label of any of the 3, that would present one as being more desirable than the other, realistically. How is being CD better than mpd, or bigenderist better than cd, or mpd better than bigenderist?
Second, I would question the reason for such claim. Sounds to me like someone who once identified and now doesn't (revenge: throwing stones back), someone trying to gather more numbers (discount their beliefs to make them come to their side), someone trying to minimize the other's identity and self esteem (I am greater than you), journalistic (in search of real answers, education, or sensational stories) or scientific enquiry hopefully followed by tests, review, further q&a, and credible research.
Third I would question the credentials and credibility. What psychology or sociology experience or education. Or is it just a amateur inquiry, diagnosis, or definitions.
Quite easily!
bravenet.com